requestId:68499abd2f5126.89322670.
The disagreement and essence of the humanistic arguments of Mencius and Xunxun
Author: Lin Guizhen (Associate Researcher of Qufu Master Fan)
Source: Author: Author authorized by Confucian Network, original article “Light Sun”
Time: Confucius was the second day of the 11th month of Wuxu in the 2569th year of the 25th year of Wuxu
style=”mso-bidi-font-weight:normal”>Day
Humanitarianism is the New Year of the Discussion of Heaven and Man, and it is also the cornerstone of society and life. Confucius did not say that human beings were good and evil, but only said that “nature is near, it is far away” and “small achievement is like nature, and it is like nature” (both hearts are the same as the common habit), but Mencius and Xunzi after Confucius wrote books that “nature is good-nature is bad” and spread very widely. In ancient times, scholars of the ancient times have always understood the differences in the theory of Mencius and Xunxun’s humanity. Recently, some purists’ conjectures made them even more confused and even purple.
The disagreement and essence of the humanistic arguments of Mencius and Xunxun官网
The Qing Dynasty Kang Bi’s “Men Meng’s Mother’s Delaying Machine and Teaching Children” (part) Bright Picture/Visual China
1. Mencius’s correct nature is good.
There are hundreds of modern articles about Mencius’s good nature, and there are many specialties between China and foreign countries. There are many new ones: Mencius did not advocate “good nature”; Mencius actually advocated “good feelings”; Mencius actually adhered to the argument of “nature is good/nature can be good/functional ability”; Mencius actually adhered to the concept of “nature is good/nature can be good/great nature”; Mencius “good nature” is a concept of “guiding nature/growing nature”; Mencius “good nature” is a discussion of “good heart/good birds/good roots/good quality/tals are not bad”, etc.
Mencius said, “Mencius’s nature is good, and he must speak of Shun”, “Love the way of Shun”, “Take the way of human beings as benevolence”, “Now it is called good nature”, “Nei Shun is the same as people”, “Nei ShunBaohua.com is the comparison of nature”, “Nei Shun is the nature of Shun”; “Xunzi” says, “Mencius is the nature of “good nature”, “human nature”, “the nature of ancient people”; “Years Fanlu” says, “Mencius is a good nature”, “everyone can be regarded as good nature”; “Sun Qing Book” says, “Mencius is also a great scholar, and is good nature of people”Baoqing; “Yuheng” says, “Mencius wrote the chapter of “Good Nature”, thinking that human nature is good, and it is bad, and things are in trouble”; “Shen Chiang” says, “Mencius called nature good, and Xun Qing called nature bad.” Therefore, Mencius said that nature is good and that nature is good is thousands of truths. The key is to understand why the nature is good.
2. Xunzi actually adheres to the nature of the people.
Xunzi said that “nature evil” was only seen in the book “nature evil” in the late Western Han Dynasty, the annotation of Yang Yu in the Tang Dynasty, and the official carving and sealing of the Song Dynasty (the titles of ancient books in the pre-Qin period were added by later generations), while Xunzi said in other words Baoqing Network ExperienceXunzi talked about his personality evil first, and the first person in Xunzi, Liu Xiang, the first person in Xun’s book, Liu Xiang, “Sun Qing Book”. Only after Liu Xiang did King Chong of Donghan and Xun’s “Shengyu” mention Xunzi’s “Shengyu” mention Xunzi’s “Shengyu”. Previously, Xunzi and Xunzi said that humanity was profitable and focused on French but did not talk about nature. Xunzi later studied the study of “Zhengyu” and “Jiangyu” and others valued education, and even more did not talk about nature. Dong Zhongshu and Sima did not refer to nature, but said that Mencius admired nature and was good at respecting Shun. Therefore, Liu Simian said that nature and evil were “in Confucianism, how could he have passed the books that had no ancestors’ descriptions for two hundred years before the Han Dynasty, and there was no counter-protest argument.”
Some, 1. The meaning of the concept of “material/nature/serious/good/bad” in “Nature Abuse” which proofreads the “material/natural/good/bad” is clearly and unified; 2. “Nature Abuse” discusses the saying of Mencius’s good nature, and its cultivation and meaning are very clear; 3. The direct destiny of “nature is bad” is not “nature is bad”, such as the meaning of “nature is bad” in “Mencius”; 4. The discussion of “nature is bad” is now five points 官网官网官网官网官网官网官网官网官网官网新官网新官网新官网新官网新官网新官网新官网新官网新官网新官网新官网新官Humanitarian benefits may lead to conflicts that cannot prove that humanitarianism is 心文心文 (nature depends on material); 5. “Nature evil” discusses that it is not straight, gum, gold, and bad (original work is evil). Humanely, “not ×” and treats this situation to achieve direct and good fortune ;6. Qualification is the original point of the original appearance, material quality must be functional, material quality is high and low, and there is no evil, and the essence is beautiful but not ethical and evil; 7. At the end of “Natural Evil”, there is still the word “bad” that is not directly “bad” and has not been changed to “bad”; 8. Xunzi cultivates his self and governs the world<a The parallel thinking system of the website leader must be based on the nature theory (how do you think about the cultivation and sages of the material nature?); 9. Dong Zhongshu was also a good person who said "the nature of quality" and "nature is the essence of nature, and good is the transformation of the king's teachings"; 10. Liu Xiang said that Dong Zhongshu "written by beautiful Sun Qing" (special article or lost), and his thoughts on "The age of age" and "The strategy of good fortune" are still consistent with Xunzi's discussion of humanity and the rule of law.
The above 12 points, plus the “Nature Abuse” chapter “A man’s nature is evil, and h